Permalink: https://doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/domination/worcester-georgia/

Abstract

Part 05 of Steven T. Newcomb's Domination Translator Series examining the Doctrine of Discovery in U.S. Supreme Court cases. The 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling protected Native nations from state laws, yet affirmed federal domination under the Doctrine of Discovery.

---

The Marshall Trilogy: Worcester v. Georgia (1832) - Domination Translator Series - Part 5 #

The 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling protected Native nations from state laws, yet affirmed federal domination under the Doctrine of Discovery.

About This Article #

This article is Part 05 of the comprehensive Domination Translator Series, which traces how the Doctrine of Discovery has shaped American law and policy from the founding of the republic to the present day.

Key Concepts #

The Domination Translator Series examines:

• How medieval principles of Christian supremacy became U.S. law
• The role of Supreme Court decisions in perpetuating discovery doctrine
• Contemporary impacts on Native nations and sovereignty
• Legal arguments and counterarguments regarding indigenous rights

Read the Full Series #

Explore the complete Domination Translator Series and related analysis:

• Series Homepage: doctrineofdiscovery.org/blog/domination/
• All Parts: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7 | Part 8 | Part 9 | Part 10 | Part 11 | Part 12 | Part 13 | Part 14 | Part 15
• Podcast: Domination Chronicles
• Author: Steven T. Newcomb

About the Author #

Steven T. Newcomb is a prolific scholar, author, and advocate dedicated to analyzing and documenting the Doctrine of Discovery's impact on indigenous sovereignty and rights. His work has been instrumental in raising awareness about how medieval principles of domination became the foundation of American legal systems.

For more information and related content:

• Steven Newcomb's Website
• Indigenous Law Institute
• Original Free Nations
• Desecrating the Sacred Documentary